September 23, 2020

How Has the Coronavirus Pandemic Affected Federal Spending on SNAP?

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a massive reduction of economic activity in the United States. Millions of Americans are out of work and are relying on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a key part of the social safety net that provides benefits to help those with low or reduced incomes buy food.

In August, the federal government spent $9.3 billion on SNAP — which is 76 percent higher than the amount spent in March (before the pandemic was widely recognized). Federal spending on the program increased significantly following the outbreak of COVID-19; from March/April to June, outlays grew at an average of 26 percent per month — nearly double the largest monthly growth seen during the Great Recession. The only time when spending on the program has grown nearly as fast was around February 2019, when benefits for that month were advanced to prepare for a government shutdown. Outlays for SNAP in July and August have begun to decline, but remain high relative to historical values; such spending still exceeds the monthly pre-pandemic record in 2012 by about $2 billion.

Federal spending on SNAP rose sharply over the past couple of months


By design, spending on SNAP (sometimes referred to as Food Stamps) automatically rises to cover a greater number of people during economic downturns. In addition, the federal government recently expanded SNAP to provide supplementary financial support to those affected by the pandemic. Both the countercyclical structure of SNAP and recent legislation have contributed to the dramatic increase in spending on the program.

SNAP is an automatic stabilizer — participation in the program naturally increases when the economy slows. Such was the case during the Great Recession, when participation grew about 20 percent, reflecting large numbers of Americans without adequate access to food.1 Today, a similar situation exists because of the COVID-19 pandemic, as significant income loss has made more people eligible for benefits. Between March and April, the latest months for which data are available, participation grew nearly 16 percent.

As noted above, in addition to the countercyclical nature of SNAP, the growth in spending also results from legislative changes to the program. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), which was signed into law on March 18, included provisions that expanded SNAP benefits for new and existing recipients during the ongoing public health emergency. In particular, the FFCRA:

  • Introduced the Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer (P-EBT), which provides benefits to families with children that rely on free or reduced-price school meals;
  • Allows states to increase maximum benefits to all households through Emergency Allotments; and
  • Suspends the work and work training requirements for able-bodied adults.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that COVID-related legislation will increase program costs by $24 billion in fiscal year 2020 and $41 billion over the next decade.

While SNAP only composes a small portion of the federal budget, it is the largest food security program in the United States. The increase in spending on the program is therefore critical in providing assistance to families during the pandemic.

1 In 2010, 14.5 percent of American households were food insecure at one point — which means that they did not have access to sufficient food due to lack of financial resources.

(Back to Citation)

Related: What is SNAP? An Overview of the Largest Federal Anti-Hunger Program

Image credit: Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Understanding the Coronavirus Crisis

Key fiscal and economic indicators as the nation responds and recovers.

National Debt Clock

See the latest numbers and learn more about the causes of our high and rising debt.