The earned income tax credit (EITC) is a measure administered through the tax code to address poverty. It was first enacted in 1975 on a temporary basis amid broader debates about welfare reform and had the primary goal of encouraging people to obtain employment. Originally designed to target low-income working families with children, the EITC has since expanded to include middle-income families and, on a much more limited basis, those without children.
The EITC works by reducing an individual’s tax liability, meaning that it reduces the amount of taxes owed. It is also refundable, so if an individual’s liability is smaller than their tax credit, they will receive the difference in the form of a refund.
About 25 million people, or nearly 80 percent of those eligible, received the EITC in 2019; the total cost of the program was $70 billion in that year.
Broadly speaking, a taxpayer’s income determines their eligibility for the EITC, and benefits for eligible workers vary by family size and marital status. For example, for 2019, the maximum amount a single person with one qualifying child could earn while still being eligible for the EITC was $41,094. For single people with no qualifying children, those making less than $15,570 were eligible for the EITC.
Workers receive a credit equal to a percentage of their earnings, up to a maximum amount. The credit increases with income up to a certain threshold, stabilizes, and then phases out. For 2019, the maximum EITC for a single person with one child was $3,526; the maximum credit for a childless worker was $529.
In addition to the federal EITC, 29 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico have EITCs. State EITCs provide additional benefits by reducing an individual’s liability for state income taxes. Those credits are similar to the federal credit, but their eligibility standards, credit amounts, and refundability vary.
The EITC is structured to benefit those at the lower end of the income distribution the most. Recipients of the EITC tend to work in the retail trade, healthcare, food service, and accommodation industries. Because benefits are targeted toward those with children, only 2 percent of EITC recipients are considered childless. Approximately one-third of recipients also receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
One concern about the EITC is that it has a high error rate; the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has estimated that between 22 and 26 percent of EITC claims contain errors. As a result of that error rate and the cost of the program, some research questions the effectiveness of the program.
However, other research supports the EITC’s success in reducing the poverty rate, including the child poverty rate, which nevertheless remains a stubborn challenge in the United States. A significant amount of research suggests that children who grow up in poverty have worse outcomes than those who do not. After Medicaid, the EITC is the second-largest program that benefits children and is a significant tool for reducing child poverty. When measuring the effects of the credit on children, the EITC is often paired with the Child Tax Credit, a tax credit that helps ease the financial burden of having children. According to research by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the two credits lifted 9.4 million people out of poverty in 2013, including about 5 million children.
Research from Harvard University, Columbia University, and the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests that the EITC may also improve mental health in mothers, promote better health outcomes in children, and have long-term positive effects on children’s educational attainment and potential future earnings.
Finally, the EITC may also have an effect on the labor market. During the early 1990s, the amount of the credit was increased and the program expanded to include childless workers. Some research has examined this expansion and most found it led to an increase in the employment rate of single mothers.
The EITC cost $70 billion in 2019. The combination of the EITC and the Child Tax Credit comprised 4.6 percent of all federal outlays, representing a fraction of the cost of other major programs.
A recent study from Rutgers University suggests that the net budgetary cost of the EITC may be lower than previously estimated. The study aimed to determine whether the credit increased or decreased public assistance usage overall by analyzing the effect the credit had on beneficiaries’ usage of unemployment and disability insurance, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and public housing. The authors estimated that the EITC’s net cost is approximately 17 percent of its budgetary cost, a result of increased tax collections and decreased spending on other programs.
The EITC is a public policy tool that is generally considered effective. By tying the value of the credit to income through its phase in, the EITC encourages people to remain employed. And gradually phasing out the benefit at higher income levels mitigates the “cliff effect,” where additional earnings would trigger a loss in benefits that would make remaining in a job less attractive economically.
Generally, reforms to the credit involve addressing the following concerns:
The EITC provides assistance to low-income families while encouraging heads of household to remain in the workforce. Addressing poverty continues to be a challenge and the EITC is an important measure to help combat it.