In December 2017, lawmakers enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which included significant changes to both individual and corporate taxes. The legislation lowered income tax rates for most individuals while modifying a number of deductions, credits and exemptions. The bill also lowered the corporate tax rate and made changes to the way worldwide income of U.S. corporations is subject to taxation.
The changes implemented by the 2017 tax act, however, yielded a tax system that remains complex, confusing, inefficient, and, some would say, unfair. The tax code is still riddled with tax expenditures, or "tax breaks," including loopholes, deductions, exemptions, credits, and preferential rates. Because such tax breaks provide financial assistance to specific activities and groups, many are actually a lot like government spending in disguise. Worse, they create market distortions that are damaging to economic growth and productivity. Finally, because the tax code raises less revenue than it did before the tax act, it increased annual deficits and added to our long-term fiscal challenges.
Many economists believe it would help the economy to do away with some or all of those tax breaks to make the code more efficient and reduce the deficit. Tax reform done right would promote economic growth, make our fiscal outlook more sustainable, reduce the complexity and burden of compliance, and increase the system’s transparency and fairness by treating individuals and businesses in similar circumstances more equally. For more background about the tax system, see Revenues.
Many worthwhile ideas have been proposed for reforming individual and corporate income taxes, in addition to proposals for new types of tax regimes.
One prominent reform strategy is to eliminate most or all of the individual income and payroll tax expenditures. In the current system, two taxpayers with the same level of income could face very different tax bills because one taxpayer takes advantage of more tax breaks — or tax expenditures — than the other. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated certain tax expenditures, many of the largest remain. Some of the most expensive tax expenditures are also the most popular, including tax breaks that cover employer-provided health benefits, retirement plans, and mortgage interest. For that reason, major changes to our tax code should be phased-in gradually to give people time to adjust.
Eliminating the remaining individual tax expenditures could allow for a number of other changes to the tax system, while producing additional revenues to improve our long-term fiscal outlook. It could also improve the efficiency of our economy and improve taxpayers’ confidence in the fairness of the overall system.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also made a number of changes to the way in which the corporate income tax is administered. Corporate tax expenditures implicitly subsidize some economic activities and sectors of the economy at the expense of others and thereby distort economic decision-making. For example, businesses are taxed differently based upon how they are organized (i.e., as corporations, Subchapter S corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, etc.). Many have suggested that an ideal system would do away with some or all of corporate tax breaks, thereby avoiding distortions generated by special provisions and instead promoting economic growth.
Other proposals would create new types of taxes to replace existing taxes or to supplement them. Two prominent examples include: