- The Fiscal
- What We're
- What You
The federal government provided $512 billion in direct financial assistance to help state and local governments cover their expenditures and revenue losses associated with the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. So far, about $400 billion of that total has been disbursed. Here are some notable trends showing how lower levels of government have spent some of their relief funds using a database compiled by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).
The Coronavirus Relief Fund, created by the CARES Act, provided $150 billion to help state and local governments cover necessary expenditures tied to the COVID-19 pandemic that were incurred between March 2020 and December 2021. About $139 billion was allocated to state and local governments, with the remaining $11 billion allocated to the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and tribal areas. The federal government has disbursed the full $150 billion from the Coronavirus Relief Fund to recipients; but NCSL’s database indicates that as of June 2021, state and local governments have committed only about half of the funds they received to various projects. Such funding was distributed for the following purposes:
States targeted at least $17 billion of their relief funds (23 percent of the reported amount) to provide financial assistance to cities, towns, and counties that did not receive direct aid from the federal government. Only 154 cities and counties, less than one percent of the total, received direct federal aid from the CARES Act because such direct payments were limited to local governments with a population of 500,000 or more.
At least $12 billion, or 15 percent of the reported funding, went towards public health efforts associated with the pandemic, including purchasing COVID-19 testing equipment, establishing temporary medical facilities, and supporting contact tracing efforts.
States utilized $10 billion or more of federal relief funds (13 percent of the reported amount) to provide financial assistance to small businesses, often in the form of grants that target specific industries or groups. For example, Rhode Island provided $10 million in grants to minority-owned businesses.
More than $8 billion of the reported federal relief funds (11 percent) were used by states to replenish their unemployment funds as well as to establish new, pandemic-related programs such as enhanced benefits for unemployed workers and virtual job training.
States also spent relief funds on other activities including helping schools prepare for expenditures related to testing, training, and cleaning; providing assistance to renters and homeowners at risk of eviction or foreclosure; and supporting nonprofit and community organizations.
Recipient governments have until December 2024 to commit their funds and until 2026 to spend them. Some governments received all of their funding in one payment, while others received half of their allocations in May 2021 and will receive the remaining half one year later. As of December 2021, approximately $249 billion, or two-thirds of the total, has been disbursed from the fund.
The Fiscal Recovery Funds have focused more on recovery than on immediate relief from the pandemic-induced downturn, giving states greater flexibility to apply their relief funds to various types of activities. In addition, the American Rescue Plan provided meaningfully larger direct relief to local governments, thereby relieving states from the need to suballocate their funds to cities, towns, and counties. NCSL’s information provides data on approximately $105 billion (42 percent) of direct aid allocations received through January 3, 2022. Some notable spending areas include:
The latest COVID-related legislation allowed states to use relief funds to replace lost public-sector revenues. As such, state operation and administration has been one of the largest categories of relief spending so far ($20 billion, or 19 percent, of the reported amount). States have also used funds to hire additional personnel and purchase equipment to administer pandemic-related programs and auditing of them.
Investments in critical infrastructure needs have been one of the main authorized uses for relief funds from the Fiscal Recovery Fund. At least 25 states have allotted $19 billion (18 percent) of the federal relief to infrastructure related to broadband, water, and sewer.
States have also continued to use federal relief on priorities that were supported with funds from the Coronavirus Relief Fund, including unemployment benefits, healthcare costs, and housing security.
Overall, the substantial federal support, as well as a strong economic recovery, have helped avert severe state budget crises. Accounting for all federal aid, state revenues surpassed pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2020 and were 23 percent higher in the third quarter of 2021 than in the first quarter of 2020. In fact, some experts have argued that the size of the direct payments to states provided through the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund was outsized relative to the pandemic’s impact on state finances, citing that the large amount of federal support may incentivize states to make tax cuts that would damage their long-term finances. Meanwhile, other analysts contend that federal aid provides states with an opportunity to make long-term investments — particularly in lower-income communities that have been hardest hit by the pandemic to ensure equitable economic recovery and growth.
However, there have been ongoing concerns about the need for more accountability, particularly in light of recent cases of fraudulent use of COVID aid money. Given the need for a quick response, the Department of Treasury had to disburse payments while guidelines for auditing recipients of the Coronavirus Relief Fund and Fiscal Recovery Fund were still under development, according to the Government Accountability Office. Many governments have also reported that they lack the capacity to efficiently disburse the funds or report on their use of relief funds consistent with the federal requirements. As states continue to expend their relief funds — and as the pandemic endures with the Omicron variant emerging — the federal government has an important opportunity to examine the impact of earlier funds, looking at ways to ensure ongoing effective distribution of the money for allowable purposes.
Image Credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images